Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02849
Original file (BC 2014 02849.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02849

				COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits (TEB) to his dependent.  


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

In Mar 13, he applied to transfer his benefits to his dependents, but needed to obtain an extension of enlistment to have the required retainability.  In Jun 14 he completed the paperwork for his extension, but when he went back to the E-benefits website to submit his original request, it caused a new request to be submitted and invalidated his original submission.  The applicant admits that the error was on his part, but requests that the Board adjust the “date of submission” to his original date of Mar 13.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

During the events under review, the applicant was serving in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of Master Sergeant (E-7).

On 13 Mar 13, the applicant submitted a request to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits.  

On 19 Jun 13, the MilConnect TEB discussion thread indicates that the applicant was sent a message informing him that he would need to extend his current enlistment and that “Failure to obtain retainability and submit the required documentation to us within 30 days of the date of this notice will result in disapproval of your application for transferability.”

On 25 Mar 14, AF Form 1411, Extension of Enlistment in the Air Force, shows that the applicant reenlisted for a period of 
23 months to qualify for TEB transfer. 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit B.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTT recommends denial.  The applicant did not complete the extension until 25 Mar 14, 8 months after the deadline.  The applicant was notified of the need to extend his enlistment contract and was given ample time to accomplish the requirement. All members requesting the opportunity to transfer the Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefit are notified of the program's requirement and given a timeline to complete the necessary actions.

A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation, was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C).  As of this date no response has been received by this office.   


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02849 in Executive Session on 11 May 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered: 
Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Jul 14.
Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/DPTT, dated 4 Sep 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Oct 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02088

    Original file (BC-2012-02088.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00676

    Original file (BC 2014 00676.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00676 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her military service obligation be changed to no later than 18 Jul 2015 in regards to transferring Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits. (3)(2), “For individuals eligible for retirement on or after Aug 1, 2011, 2 years of additional service required.” The DoDI clearly states the amount of service commitment that a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02064

    Original file (BC 2014 02064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In accordance with AFI 36-2306, “For individuals eligible for retirement on 1 Aug 09, no additional service is required.” Given that the applicant was eligible for retirement prior to 1 Aug 09, he would have incurred no active duty service commitment (ADSC) obligation with TEB approval. Based on the applicant’s retirement date, he retired prior to the TEB program being established and therefore, he is not eligible to transfer benefits to his dependents. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00764

    Original file (BC 2014 00764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00764 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits (TEB) to his dependents on 19 Dec 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03578

    Original file (BC 2014 03578.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although he already submitted for the TEB he would have reenlisted to ensure approval of his TEB, but was precluded due to his service connected disability, which forced him to medically retire. “For those members eligible for retirement after 1 August 2011, and on or before 1 August 2012, three years of additional service from the date of request is required.” Based on the date he became eligible to retire, he would have incurred a 3-year active duty service commitment (ADSC) obligation on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03120

    Original file (BC 2013 03120.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The mechanism for transferring Post- 9/11 GI Bill benefits has been available since 29 June 2009 but, by law, the member is required to be active duty or selected reserve on the date the request to transfer is initiated. Based on the facts provided, the applicant is not eligible to transfer his benefits to his dependents as defined in Public Law No. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05250

    Original file (BC 2013 05250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant to Service regulations (Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)). The applicant refers...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03501

    Original file (BC 2014 03501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    “For those members eligible for retirement after 1 Aug 10 and on or before 1 Aug 11, two years of additional service from the date of request is required.” Based on the date he became eligible to retire, he would have incurred a two-year active duty service commitment (ADSC) obligation from the date he applied for the TEB. The applicant did not make a request for transfer prior to his retirement date of 4 May 12. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03009

    Original file (BC 2012 03009.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03009 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his children. ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he converted his old GI Bill benefits to the Post 9/11 GI Bill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04352

    Original file (BC-2011-04352.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    110-252, for the first time in history, service members were able to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to their dependents. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 23 Sep 10, he elected to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits. ...